Categories
Blog

Congressional Medicaid Proposals Would Mean Big Cuts to Medicaid, Higher Costs for Texas

As CPPP’s Stacey Pogue recently explained, U.S. House leaders are expected to file legislation within days that will begin to repeal and “replace” the Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or Obamacare). Based on an outline made public in February, the bill is expected to result in fewer people being able to afford insurance—especially low- and moderate-income individuals—and in allowing insurance plans to cover fewer benefits.
Beyond cutting affordability and consumer protections for private health insurance coverage, the U.S. House outline also proposed a radical restructuring of Medicaid. Based on the outline, a leaked bill draft that was analyzed by many experts, and the actual bills filed and officially “scored” last summer (2016), last summer’s House bill did not just “bend the cost curve”—like dropping the growth in per-enrollee cost from six percent to three percent a year—but actually cut federal Medicaid funds to Texas below current levels by as much as 25  percent. So, the very first question we will ask when an actual bill is finally filed will be, “does it cut Texas Medicaid funds below current levels, which would force cuts to eligibility, benefits, or provider pay? And, by how much?”
Another critical point is that last summer’s bill would have cut Texas Medicaid by roughly $4.8 billion (20 percent of federal Medicaid dollars to Texas in 2016) in the second year of that law, regardless of whether Texas chose a Block Grant or a Per Capita Cap (also known as per beneficiary allotment). In other words, no matter what went into the complex formula for a state Medicaid block grant or per capita cap, Congress still planned to cut Medicaid funding to all the states below the base year! There is a big difference between “bending the curve” and this enormous cost shift from the federal budget to the state.
To give you a frame of reference, a $4.8 billion cut in federal Medicaid funds would be 48 times larger than the $150 million state dollar 2015 Medicaid Pediatric Therapy Cuts, and four to five times the size of even the massive 2003 Medicaid cuts (the $500 million federal funds annually then was just under 5% of total federal Medicaid funding for 2004).

Texas has many additional worries in a federal Medicaid cut-back, including whether we can keep our 1115 waiver dollars and other funds for hospitals; whether we will be locked in forever to physician and other health professional fees that have not had regular updates for over 20 years; whether we will forfeit an estimated $6 to $8 billion a year in Medicaid Expansion funding that 31 other states have received; and whether we can ever get federal dollars for our remaining uninsured or for over 200,000 Texans with disabilities on waiting lists for community care.
For a full check-list of all the issues and concerns for Texas Medicaid, see this new CPPP guide to understanding Medicaid Block Grant and Per Capita Cap proposals  and how they could impact (and damage) Texans’ access to health care. Then follow along with our CPPP team as we analysis the next Congressional proposals as they become official. Then we can all work together to make sure all our elected officials in Austin and Washington know exactly what is at stake for Texas.

Categories
Report

It’s Time to Renovate Our School Finance System

Categories
Uncategorized

It’s Time to Address the Shrinking Middle Class in Texas

Categories
Testimony

Public Testimony in Support of House Bill 10

Categories
Infographic

Texas Biennial Budget Cycle

Categories
Report

How the Texas Education Commissioner Decided to Give $100 Million to Rich Homeowners in Rich School Districts- The effect of the local option homestead exemption

Categories
Report

A Texas-Sized Problem- How to Limit Out-of-Control Surprise Medical Billing Feb. 2017

Categories
Testimony

Testimony- Senate Finance Committee — Potential impact of a TANF kinship subsidy carve-out program in Texas

Categories
Blog

When Does Texas Senate’s Deep Medicaid “Under-Funding” Become a “Cut”?

This week CPPP joins dozens of other Texans—individuals and organizations—to testify on the Texas Senate’s current state budget proposal, Senate Bill 1.
As our testimony details, we are alarmed by several key Senate budget proposals related to Medicaid:

  1. Not fully funding Medicaid in the final month(s) of the 2016-2017 budget, denying $1.2 billion in general revenue (state dollars) to this critical program
  2. Not funding the $1.2 billion general revenue gap in Medicaid base funding in the 2018-2019 budget
  3. Not including enrollment growth costs (over $700 million) in the budget, though instructions from the Governor and the Legislative Budget Board called for factoring in such growth
  4. A rider requiring an additional 1.5 percent in GR cuts across the budget, with only K-12 formula funding (Foundation School Program) exempt. If distributed evenly across the budget, this would require another $400 million GR (or more) in Medicaid funding reductions.

The Center is also alarmed that HHSC Commissioner Smith noted in his briefing material for the Committee, “(t)o the extent the Legislature wants to make adjustments to optional benefits and eligibility, this funding request may be reduced.”  We recall all too well the disastrous 2003 Legislative cuts to Medicaid and CHIP,[i] nearly all of which were reversed.  Lawmakers made cuts to eligibility for maternity coverage, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and they eliminated eyeglasses, hearing aids, mental health services, and podiatry for all adults including seniors and adults with disabilities.  Kids covered by CHIP dropped by over 200,000 (a 40 percent drop), and seniors and adults with disabilities faced worsening outcomes as their mental health, vision, and hearing needs went without treatment.
Is Under-funding a Cut?  Texas has often in the last 20 years used low enrollment and spending budget numbers for Medicaid, to allow for a smaller balanced budget to be passed, but virtually guaranteeing a supplemental appropriation will be required in the next session to fund the final months of Medicaid (currently running around $1.5 billion GR a month).
If budget writers or state leaders do not direct the Medicaid agency to make a program, eligibility, or benefit cut to reduce spending to meet the number written into the budget, then the under-funding does not have to result in reduced eligibility or services for Texans on Medicaid. The Legislature can fill the gap in the next session.  But if bills are passed or budget riders are included that direct HHSC to reduce spending, then fewer Texans in need of Medicaid will be covered, and/or the children, seniors, Texans with disabilities and pregnant women served today will get fewer health care services.
So at this point in the budget process, we can say that we are deeply concerned about the large size of the under-funding, and worried that they will become cuts that are even deeper than the failed cuts of 2003.
Texas need not face these cuts in 2018.  To avoid these damaging cuts and meet other critical state needs, the Legislature should access the Rainy Day Fund.  The Legislature could use $4.4 billion from the Fund and still not go below the $7.5 billion sufficient balance target adopted. The Rainy Day Fund is specifically designed for times like these, when a strategic investment of resources can prevent or reduce sudden massive cuts to schools, health care and other state services.

[i] Truth and Consequences: The State Budget for 2004-05 and its Impact on Texans; June 2004; page 25, http://library.cppp.org/files/6/budgetimpact04-web.pdf
Categories
Presentation

High-Stakes Health Care – Essentials on the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid and CHIP in a Trump Administration