Categories
Blog

Real Protections for Kids and Families in the Newest Texas Medicaid Managed Care Laws

In June 2018, the Dallas Morning News began publishing a series of in-depth investigative reports on Texans harmed through Medicaid managed care, potential conflicts of interest, and weaknesses in oversight and enforcement of Medicaid managed care contracts. The articles resulted in public hearings in the Texas House of Representatives that further explored the issues and allowed the public to comment.

In response, Texas’ Medicaid agency announced 90 new hires for Medicaid managed care, and conversations among consumer advocates, providers, health plans, and the agency were set in motion. As Texas’ 2019 legislative session approached, it was clear that meaningful reforms were needed to ensure kids, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities in Texas Medicaid get the health care they need.

Public interest advocacy related to Medicaid managed care is layered with challenges: complex policy, equally complex politics, and massive profits—over $450 million netted by Texas Medicaid managed care health plans in 2018—that bring the plans political power and lobbying capacity.  In Texas, Medicaid managed care launched over 25 years ago, and is the only version of Medicaid that most lawmakers have ever known.  And in those 25 years, struggles between health care providers and Medicaid managed care insurance plans (MCOs) have been a constant.  Public interest advocates have to speak loudly to be heard over the clashes between these titan interests.

In Texas, a diverse group of advocates has worked hard to leverage the attention of media and lawmakers, respond to legislators, coordinate testimony, educate lawmakers, and communicate with health care provider associations committed to Medicaid managed care reforms.

When the legislature convened in 2019, more than 50 bills directly related to the issues raised by the Dallas Morning News and the public hearings were filed. A much smaller number passed into law, but they signal major steps forward.

Some high-level reforms that Texas adopted:

New “External Medical Review” option when a doctor-ordered treatment or health service is reduced or denied by a Medicaid managed care insurer (MCO). Today, when a MCO denies or reduces care, the MCO’s “internal appeal” process is not transparent for either the patient or the medical provider recommending treatment. The only next step available today is a federally-required Medicaid fair hearing, but the decision-makers in those hearings don’t have the medical training to analyze whether the services prescribed are medically necessary, nor are they trained on the “functional needs” that allow Medicaid beneficiaries to qualify for long term services and supports.

Going forward, Texas Medicaid will establish a system of independent external reviews that beneficiaries can request, modeled in part on the independent external reviews long available under state law to Texans with private health insurance, and the newer federal external review process established under the ACA. The external medical review will help Medicaid enrollees get an objective, unbiased review of a medical necessity determination, with reviews performed by clinical staff with education and practice in the same or similar area as the health service in question.

“Prior Authorization” (PA) reforms: Reducing barriers and red tape between enrollees and the care they need. Most denials or reductions of care come about when a care provider requests “prior authorization” (PA) from the MCO for a medication, course of treatment, procedure, or medical equipment for a Medicaid enrollee.  Texas physicians made reforming Medicaid Managed Care plans’ PA processes their top priority.  Now, under the passed measures:

  • PA denial notices to enrollees and providers must provide clear reasons, and explain the exact steps needed to gain approval.
  • Every Texas Medicaid MCO will have to publicize all of its PA requirements, including the documents and standards a health provider needs to submit to gain authorization. This greater transparency should make it much more likely that a care provider can submit all the documentation needed to get authorization on the first try.
  • Texas Medicaid MCOs must conduct an annual review/update of their PA requirements. This step will shed light on any MCOs which have PA requirements that are outliers, not supported by medical research, or conflict with federal or state policy.

“No Wrong Door” for complaints, troubleshooting. Texas law has required a “help line” for Medicaid Managed Care enrollees for over 20 years, but the new laws aim to raise the bar for providing help to enrollees. Texas Medicaid is directed to harness the power of tracking records of complaints, appeals, denials and corrective actions to improve both support for beneficiaries and MCO accountability.  Complaints will be aggregated regardless of the source whether from enrollee contacting the Medicaid agency’s managed care helpline, or a legislator’s office calling on behalf of a constituent.

Special protections for kids in foster care, children with disabilities, and medically fragile kids. Texas has moved aggressively to include children in state custody, kids with SSI disability-based Medicaid, and the sub-groups of both of those categories who have medically complex conditions into Medicaid managed care plans in recent years. The most shocking revelations in the Dallas Morning News reporting series and the legislative hearings that followed involved medically fragile children and other children with disabilities.

This focus and the relentless, organized advocacy by parents of medically fragile children yielded many important policy gains. They include:

  • A special hotline for children who are medically dependent or have multiple disabilities
  • Better coordination between Medicaid and private insurance for kids who are enrolled in both, including better access to medications and specialty care
  • Piloting consumer-directed options, accountable care organizations, and other models promoted by the federal Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovations

Slowing down on Medicaid managed care for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Despite the warning signs from Texas’ troubled roll-out of Medicaid managed care for foster children and children with disabilities, Texas law still called for moving Medicaid recipients with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) into MCOs in 2021.

New laws passed this session, however, detail a more thoughtful plan to amend that timeline in favor of a pilot program with voluntary participation based on consumer preferences, least restrictive settings, and consumer direction. They also include guardrails for experimental rate methodologies, a comprehensive inventory of benefits, articulated goals, and meaningful evaluation. Statute still identifies plans to move individuals with IDD into MCOs between 2027 and 2031, but the agency is given specific authority to delay deadlines as needed to protect access to services and supports.

Still, many consumer protections initially in legislative proposals did not make it to the finish line.

The newly passed Medicaid managed care reforms above are certainly worth celebrating. Yet, some ambitious proposed consumer protections did not survive the contentious legislative process.  Some examples of proposals that did not pass include:

  • A comprehensive requirement that would have imposed financial penalties (“liquidated damages”) on MCOs when they fail to comply with their contracts; and a public record of the enforcement actions.
  • A requirement that every MCO make medical staff available every day (including early morning and evenings, and for limited hours on weekends and holidays) to allow physicians to consult on prior authorizations for medical care.
  • Analysis by Texas’ independent External Quality Review Organizations (EQRO) of the aggregate track records created from MCO inquiries, complaints about access, grievances, denials, appeals, overturned denials, and fair hearings, including comparing the track records of both for-profit and non-profit MCOs.
  • Automatic continuation of the health service or treatment that an MCO proposes to deny or reduce, pending the outcome of all appeals, reviews, and fair hearings.
  • An online tracking system to allow Medicaid enrollees to follow the status of their appeal to an MCO relayed to a reduction or denial of benefits.

Fortunately, Texas’ Medicaid agency has been planning ahead for expected new reform laws, and early indications are that the agency is moving ahead quickly with new approaches. These include an expanded role for a statewide Medicaid managed care advisory committee, and a strong plan for building the “no-wrong door” model.  They plan to keep records of all complaints resolved during the initial contact with the agency (to identify areas for improvement), and have made a new commitment to track all complaints through final resolution.

Texas’ legislative session ended in May 2019 with a major legislative success for kids and families.  Implementation of many reforms will require the Medicaid agency to develop new rules, amend the agency’s contracts with MCOs, and seek federal approval for some changes.

Ultimately, fulfilling the promise of reform will depend on the strength of the Medicaid agency and Texas elected officials to enforce new standards.  Realizing the promise of reform truly will take a village. Advocates for Texas children, families, people with disabilities, and seniors must continue the drumbeat, insist on steady progress, and push for robust implementation in the months and years ahead.

This piece was written by Anne Dunkelberg, who serves as the CPPP Associate Director/Health & Wellness Team Director, and Adriana Kohler, who serves as Senior Health Policy Associate for Texans Care for Children. See the original publication from the Center for Children & Families (CCF) of the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute.

Categories
Report

Community Eligibility- Feeding All Your Students for Free Feed more students while raising more revenue for schools

Categories
Blog

Redefining Poverty Doesn’t Eliminate Families’ Struggles

Misguided numbers trick would “move the goal posts” and reduce health care, food, housing benefits and more for millions of Americans

Update: Read CPPP’s Public Comment Opposing the New Federal Proposal that would redefine U.S. Poverty Line

Overview: The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a notice on May 6 requesting comments on changing the way annual inflation updates are calculated for the federal poverty line. OMB is seeking public comments on the idea of using one of two alternative, lower measures of inflation than the current measure. 

Many basic needs programs that work with low-income people use the poverty guidelines as their eligibility thresholds, which are updated annually based on inflation. This new proposal would lower the dollar amounts of those updated poverty thresholds going forward, resulting in fewer low-income American households qualifying for help, or families getting reduced help from those programs. With each additional year of a smaller inflation update under the proposed change, the loss of services for Americans would grow. 

Affected programs would include: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps); School meals; the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infants, and Children (WIC); Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Medicare help with premiums, co-payments and prescription medications; Affordable Care Act Marketplace assistance with premiums and out-of-pocket costs; family planning, home energy assistance; Head Start; Community and Migrant Health Centers; AIDS drug assistance; the Job Corps; the Community Services Block Grant, and legal services for the poor.

Take Action:  Submit comments via this online portal before the June 21s deadline. Tell the OMB you oppose this rule change. 

Then, help forward this information to more Texas organizations and communities to encourage them to comment.

Who Should Comment:

  • Local and state elected officials and local health and human service agencies:  if regulators use this change to reduce federal support for services, local governments will be left to fill the growing gap in unmet needs.
  • Health care and social service providers, and their associations
  • Food banks, food pantries, and other anti-hunger programs
  • School districts and boards
  • Advocacy organizations concerned with health care, hunger, poverty, child care, access to justice

Important Topics to Include in Comments:

  • Directly address the OMB claim that the poverty level income guidelines today are more than adequate, and that they need to grow more slowly.  Comment on the evidence from your work that the current federal poverty income guidelines are already well below what it takes to support a family, and that shrinking the inflation update will make the poverty guidelines an even less accurate measure of need.
  • Tell OMB that before making a change that will result in a lower poverty income threshold, they must first do extensive research and in-depth analysis, including taking public comments, on: the numbers and types of Americans affected; safety, health, and developmental impacts; impacts on school districts; the fiscal impacts on households and local governments; and other impacts you expect to see among your constituents or the families you serve.  (Why? OMB specifically stated that they are not seeking comments on how lowering the poverty guidelines would affect programs that use those guidelines. They are contemplating making this change without researching the impact first.  Your comments can show that you expect major impacts on families and your community, and can call on the federal government to do that analysis before making this change.)

How to submit your comments:

  1. You can use this portal created by the Coalition for Human Needs; or
  2. Email your comments, addressed to: Nancy Potok, Chief Statistician, Office of Management and Budget, to Statistical_Directives@omb.eop.gov, using “Directive No. 14” in your subject line.

Why Comment?

This OMB request for comments is not part of an official rule-making proposal, so the requirements for taking public comments into account or responding to them are not as clear as for proposed rules.  But diverse comments in the public record can achieve these important ends:

  • Publicize the impact on people: loss of health, nutrition or other assistance. Comments can show who would be denied assistance, such as children, minorities, seniors, or people with disabilities.
  • Question the validity of proposed changes to the inflation index: The Trump Administration has highlighted a specific alternative inflation adjustment, called the Chained Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U). It rises about three-quarters of a percentage point more slowly than the measure now used to adjust the annual poverty measure. Research has indicated that the Chained CPI may not be valid for people who are poor or near-poor.
  • Point out that any attempt to measure poverty accurately needs far more than a change in the inflation adjustment; it should take into account current estimates of income and expenditures. It should also take into account the evidence that people with incomes now defined as above the poverty threshold suffer considerable hardship (food insecurity, little or no savings, falling behind in rent or other bills, etc.)
  • Raise questions that can be influential with important policy-makers or with the courts: Key members of Congress may weigh in with the Trump Administration to persuade them of the harm of such a change or work to prevent it via legislation. If there is litigation around changing the inflation adjustment, comments may guide court decisions.

More background reading, and answers to your questions:

Categories
Report

Direct Certification- Best Practices for Feeding Students for Free

Categories
Blog

Where Are the Texas Medicaid Managed Care Protections?

Will the reforms survive to become law this Legislative session?

Legislation to improve health care for Medicaid participants and improve insurer performance and accountability is at risk of failing to become law due to late-hour conflicts and legislative process delays. Will all the extensive analysis, public hearings, and negotiations over the last nine months to develop improved policies have been a waste?

Lawmakers filed over 50 bills aimed at reforming Texas Medicaid Managed Care this legislative session, and many had public hearings in April. Today, some clear frontrunners have emerged, but we remain a long way from final decisions about which bills will pass and which reforms will survive the process. Health care provider and health insurance industry associations have put in long hours lobbying for their respective goals and priorities, and the consumer advocates have added their two cents wherever possible.

Notably, several substantial agreed-to policy proposals emerged from a working group of physician, hospital, and insurer lobbyists. While disagreements on other important issues remain, some fundamental improvements have come out of this work. These include the implementation of a new independent medical review option to which participants and providers can appeal denials and reductions of care made by Medicaid Managed Care plans (often referred to as MCOs). There also seems to be consensus around robust new transparency and accountability requirements for MCO “Prior Authorization” requirements before people can access a service. If those two general concepts survive the hectic last month of this legislative session relatively intact, there will be meaningful progress. Advocates for Texans with disabilities and medically fragile children have made important expert contributions to the development of bills.

A number of critical proposed consumer protections for Texas’ 4 million Medicaid participants are in the bills that are “moving.” This post and policy brief looks at five bills. HB 2453 by Sarah Davis, HB 4178 by James Frank, and SB 1105 by Lois Kolkhorst are lengthier bills that cover multiple Medicaid Managed Care topics. HB 3721 by Joe Deshotel and SB 1140 by Kirk Watson (joint authors Hinojosa and West) are single-topic bills to create the new independent medical review option for denials and reductions of care. However, HB 2453 and HB 4178 each also contain provisions to establish the independent medical review function. Together these bills include important proposals on these fundamental Medicaid Managed Care reform topics:

  • New Independent Medical Review option, to appeal denials or reductions of care by MCOs, or eligibility denials by HHSC based on medical necessity or functional need
  • MCO Accountability: tracking and creating public records of complaints, appeals, denials and corrective actions
  • Issues for STAR Kids (children with disabilities and medically fragile kids) and STAR Health (kids in foster care, which includes some medically fragile children)
  • Care Coordination Transparency and Adequacy
  • “Prior Authorization” (PA) Reforms: Reducing Barriers and Red Tape between enrollees and the care they need.
  • Improved Benefits, Network Adequacy, and Quality
  • Provisions to Improve the Medicaid Managed Care Provider Experience

Details on each of these topics and the bills are summarized here, beginning with the proposals for an independent medical review option.

Put simply, to get the best protections for Texas Medicaid, the Legislature will need to incorporate provisions from several bills: no single bill currently delivers all of the needed consumer protections. The 86th Legislature has just a few short weeks to get the job done to protect 4 million Texans and the integrity of our public investment in Medicaid Managed Care.

Note: “MCO” stands for Managed Care Organization. All Texas Medicaid Managed Care health plans are licensed as HMOs, but “MCO” is a term used nationally in Medicaid, in order to be inclusive in states where HMOs are not the only vehicle for Medicaid Managed Care delivery.

Categories
Report

2020 Census- Texas Needs to Invest in a Statewide Complete Count Committee

Categories
Testimony

Testimony in Support HB 3240

Categories
Testimony

Testimony in Support of HB 1040- The Texas Promise Grant Program

Categories
Report

School Finance Reform Moves to the Senate

Categories
Report

Watch Out for a Wasteful Tax Giveaway Moving Quickly through the Texas Legislature